‘Justice League’ movie set for 2015: What we want to know

DC Comics won a round – maybe the final round – in the long-running legal battle over rights to the Superman character just yesterday, and today’s L.A. Times says DC/Warner Bros. is planning to release a “Justice League” movie in 2015.

Interesting timing there, DC. It just so happens that the “Avengers” sequel comes out in the summer of 2015.

For years now, DC has been unable to get its rich comic book catalogue onto the big screen in any successful manner besides Christopher Nolan’s “Dark Knight” movies. Although Nolan is overseeing “Man of Steel” for next summer, he and his grim and gritty Batman weren’t a likely fit for a “Justice League” movie.

In other words, it seemed like DC/Warners/Nolan were as ashamed of colorful characters and tights as 20th Century Fox was back when they put the “X-Men” in black leather rather than blue and yellow.

The Times article indicates that DC will not try to introduce its “Justice League” heroes in solo big-screen adventures before teaming them up.

Here are some questions we’ll be interested in seeing answered sometime:

Will Henry Cavill, set to star in “Man of Steel” next year, return as Superman in “Justice League?” Or is Cavill one and done before his movie even comes out?

Will Joseph Gordon-Levitt play Robin John Blake as Batman in “Justice League?” Or will DC ensure that Bruce Wayne is the Batman we’ll see in the team-up movie? And we know that won’t be Christian Bale.

Will they find a “realistic” actress to play Wonder Woman? Or will the Amazon Princess be played by a five-foot-tall, 100-pounder?

Will Ryan Reynolds return as Green Lantern? It seems unlikely. How about making GL the GL that kids know, John Stewart?

Which “other” Leaguers will make the cut? We have to have the Flash. How about Aquaman? One of the Hawks? Cyborg, who’s part of the current comic book lineup?

Will DC’s apparent intention to introduce the characters in the team-up movie – a probably necessary reversal of Marvel’s strategy of introducing the future “Avengers” in solo movies – work?

And can we please, please, please avoid mini-origin stories for each JL member?

 

 

Today in Halloween: Scared people in Canadian haunted house

I might as well link to this since everyone else is.

Here’s a link to one of many, many places online where you can find pictures taken inside the Nightmare Fear Factory, a haunted house on the Canadian side of Niagara Falls.

The haunted house’s owners put still and video cameras at strategic scary parts of the haunted house. The resulting photos are hilarious.

Enjoy.

iPhoneography: Fall colors

I dread the onset of winter, but I really like a lot about fall: Halloween, crisp colors and the colors of turning leaves.

So here are a few fall pics I snapped with my iPhone while on a walk tonight.

 

Close up or at a distance, the colors are so warm they belie the cool weather.

 

Jet trails make a nice contrasting image.

 

Today in Halloween: Clowns and Indians?

Here’s another of our looks back at old-timey Halloween costumes, pulled from the vast array somebody plunked down on the Internet.

Your guess is as good as mine – likely better – on a time frame for this snapshot. The boots on the kid in the middle are interesting and make me guess early first half of the 20th century.

As for the costumes?

The fringe on the kids on the outside makes me think they’re western getups, maybe Indian costumes.

And while I can’t quite figure out the mask on the kid in the middle, that outfit sure looks like one worn by a clown or jester.

More next time.

Why we should care about ‘Ant-Man’

Disney announced today the Nov. 6, 2015 release of “Ant-Man,” directed by Edgar Wright and featuring the longtime Marvel Comics hero. No casting has yet been announced.

Why should we be excited about “Ant-Man?” He’s just a guy who shrinks, right?

Wrong. Here’s why we’re excited about “Ant-Man.”

Edgar Wright. This is the guy who directed cult classics like “Shaun of the Dead” and “Hot Fuzz.” And he loves Ant-Man. He’ll bring an offbeat approach to a somewhat offbeat hero.

He’s important. Ant-Man, also known as Henry Pym, was a founding member of the Avengers. He’s been there since the beginning – in the comics, at least. He’s linked to the Wasp, his girlfriend/wife Janet Van Dyne, who in the comics gave the team its name.

He might be edgy. If they choose to go that way, “Ant-Man” as a solo movie or member of “The Avengers” paves the way for some domestic drama. In some versions of the character, Pym has anger control issues and even abuses his wife. It’s a character point not unlike Tony Stark’s alcoholism. It might not make its way into the movies, but a lot of people will be wondering and speculating, and that creates buzz.

Ant-Man is not Aquaman. I love Aquaman as much as anybody, but he’s (unfairly) received a reputation as the worst member of the Justice League. And to the outside observer, Ant-Man seems just as limited. He shrinks. Hmm. But in reality, Henry Pym has a lot of cool capabilities – apparently the Ant-Man test footage screened this summer at conventions demonstrated this – and they’re not all based around shrinking. Pym has also, at various times, adopted other personnas including Giant-Man (Guess what? He not only shrinks!) and Yellowjacket (Goes with Wasp, get it?). Plus he’s a genius, not unlike Tony Stark and Bruce Banner. Getting Pym on the team will add a lot to the roster.

Most of all, Ant-Man’s existence in the Marvel movie universe paves the way for my favorite Avengers villain of all time, Ultron, an android created by Pym who becomes a recurring and deadly enemy for the supergroup. If the next “Avengers” movie – due out a few months before “Ant-Man” – revolves around Thanos – that guy glimpsed in the end credits of “The Avengers” – then Ultron would make a great bad guy for the third movie.

Excited yet?

‘The Walking Dead’ returns with ‘Seed’

When last we saw the survivors of the zombie apocalypse, they had weathered a long, long season at Hershel’s farm and were on the verge of discovering the prison where, we imagine, much of the third season of “The Walking Dead” will take place. Andrea, meanwhile, has been rescued from walkers by a mysterious woman with a sword and two zombies in chains.

The woman is, of course, Michonne, a fan favorite from the comics, here played by Danai Guirara. She’s only one of the changes in the new season.

Tonight’s third season premiere of “The Walking Dead,” “Seed,” opened with Rick leading the others into a a house, cleaning it of zombies. Months have passed. We can tell because Lori is pretty far along into her pregnancy. The group has turned to foraging in a big way. Carl rustles up canned food and Daryl shoots and plucks an owl. (Sorry Hedwig.)

The group comes across the prison and it seems like a natural hunkering-down place, complete with two sets of fencing to keep walkers out. The survivors set about cleaning the inside of the prison of zombies. Because they’re low on ammo, that means hand-to-zombie-hand combat. There’s some funny, innovative stuff here, including how you kill walker prison guards in protective riot gear.

While the prison assault – yeesh – is taking place, we meet Michonne, who is a badass. She and Andrea have formed a bond over the past few months as well. I’m looking forward to their getting to Woodbury, the town overseen by the Governor.

Aside from the gleefully gory walker extermination scenes, a lot of tonight’s episode left me oddly unmoved until near the very end, a nicely claustrophobic inside the prison that seems to seals the fate of a major character.

Random thoughts:

I know Daryl looks cool on it, but I wouldn’t be riding a motorcycle with zombies lurching around. Same for Maggie’s strappy tank top, hot as it is. I’d be wearing heavy Carhartts or something.

New opening credits. Still pretty creepy.

Lots of walker wasting tonight.

Daryl wields a crossbow and gives backrubs? He’s dreamy.

Still can’t bring myself to care about Lori. Just can’t.

Today in Halloween: Let’s join the circus!

Here’s our latest look at vintage Halloween photos from the World Wide Web.

In my ongoing half-assed effort to guess about the origin of these pictures, I’m going to speculate that this photo depicts high schoolers in the area of Peru, Indiana, in the first half of the 20th century.

Why?

Because Peru has always been a haven for circus performers and the abundance of clowns in the picture makes me think these kids borrowed some of their parents’ professional makeup.

I don’t know what to make of the guy at lower right. Devil? Yellow peril?

‘Dark Places’ takes readers to … uh, some dark places

Gillian Flynn took the bestseller list by storm this summer with “Gone Girl,” a clever and well-written thriller about a marriage gone horribly wrong. Or, more jaded readers could argue, a piercing indictment of marriage as an institution.

I liked “Gone Girl” a lot, despite coming away from reading it kind of bummed out. So reading Flynn’s two earlier books, “Sharp Objects” and “Dark Places,” became a priority for me.

I’ve just finished her 2009 novel “Dark Places” and it wins the truth in advertising award. It’s pretty damn dark.

If you haven’t read it in the past three years you might now that the publisher is giving it a push in conjunction with the huge success of “Gone Girl.” At Target, for example, the three books are side by side on the shelves.

And honestly that push is appropriate because “Dark Places” is very true to Flynn’s style and tone.

“Dark Places” does for family life what “Gone Girl” did for marriage. In other words, makes you reconsider the institution.

“Dark Places” follows the life of Libby Day, a 30-something survivor of a horrific childhood trauma. In 1985, when Libby was 7 and living in Missouri, her mother and two sisters were brutally killed by a late-night intruder in their home. Libby escaped the house that cold night although she lost fingers and toes to frostbite and over-zealous medical treatment.

Libby helped authorities convict her 15-year-old brother, Ben, of killing their mother and two sisters. Ben was sentenced to life in prison.

In the decades since, Libby has drifted through life in a depressed haze. She’s lived off donations for the orphan of the “Missouri massacre” but the money is running out.

So when Libby is approached by the “Kill Club,” a group of people obsessed with murders from recent history, she jumps at the chance to make some money by selling family memories.

Before long Libby is going to prison to see her brother for the first time since the trial and even searching the Plains States for her father, Runner, a good-for-nothing type who some of Ben’s supporters in the Kill Club consider the true killer of the Day family.

Flynn takes Libby and readers to some pretty low places in a search for dollars that gradually turns into a search for truth. Chapters flash back and forth from Libby’s perspective to that of her brother and mother in the days leading up to the 1985 mass murders. It’s a technique that I don’t usually like but Flynn does it very well here.

Flynn does resort to some of the tactics that I don’t like about modern mysteries (multiple culprits, multiple solutions) but the strength of the book isn’t the mystery, strangely enough, but the characters. Watching her story unfold is a little like watching a slow-motion car accident. You care about these characters and what’s happening to them at the same time you’re horrified. But you can’t look away.

It’ll be interesting to see how Hollywood treats Flynn’s books. Reese Witherspoon is apparently adapting “Gone Girl” and I’ve read there’s a movie version of “Dark Places” underway starring Amy Adams. The role of Libby isn’t one that you would expect an actress like Adams to play, so it makes me wonder if the movie won’t turn Libby into a typical Lifetime movie heroine.

Coulson Lives? Coulson Lives in new ‘S.H.I.E.L.D’ series?

Is Clark Gregg destined to return as Agent Phil (“His first name is Agent”) Coulson in the upcoming “SHIELD” TV series?

Those newsy guys and gals at Comic Book Resources are reporting that Jeph Loeb, head of Marvel’s TV unit, and Joss Whedon, “Avengers” director and Marvel movie and TV universe consultant, took the stage (the latter via video) at New York Comic Con and announced that Clark Gregg would be part of the upcoming “SHIELD” TV series:

“He’s headlining the S.H.I.E.L.D. show and always was.” said Whedon.

Loeb confirmed Clark Gregg is the first member cast in Whedon’s “S.H.I.E.L.D.”

Gregg was on hand too.

Assuming this wasn’t some kind of joke that was misinterpreted, it’s pretty cool news. As everyone who saw “The Avengers” knows, Coulson – who had small roles in most of the Marvel movies leading up to “The Avengers” – died by Loki’s hand in the movie.

His death gave the Avengers something to avenge.

Despite an on-stage reference – which might have been a joking one – to Life Model Decoys (lifelike robots developed by SHIELD in the comics and mentioned by Tony Stark in “The Avengers”), we’re left wondering how Coulson will return in the “SHIELD” TV series.

Did he not really die at Loki’s hand in “The Avengers?” If so, that kind of cheapens his death.

Will the TV series be set before the events of “The Avengers?” If so … not another prequel.

Will Coulson be a hologram, something like the hologram doctor in “Star Trek: Voyager?”

Or will Phil be reborn as the Vision, the android Avenger?

We’ve already seen this cool fan-made sculpture of Gregg as the Vision, and we’ve noted here before that “The Avengers” seems to hint at Coulson being the Vision. Remember the whole “cellist girlfriend” thing? Remember how Ain’t It Cool noted that Vision’s wife in the comics, Scarlet Witch, is a cellist?

Here’s to some more news, and soon.

 

Today in Halloween: A truly frightening bust

Here’s another dip into the vintage Halloween snapshots resource that is the vast series of tubes we know as the Internet.

I’ve seen a lot of these photos on the web but there’s little explanation of their origin. I’ve been making some (not-so) educated guesses on a few of them.

This one seems to be another with a rural setting, based in part on what looks like a field or rolling hills in the background and … holy hell, what’s the deal with the trick-or-treater on the right?

The other three have that mix of old clothes and bizarrely terrifying masks that we’ve become accustomed to in these vintage photos. Ditto for the one on the right, with two very noticeable exceptions.

Maybe I’m missing the point here, but wonder why this kid put on a creepy mask and then stuffed her bust with a couple of couch cushions?

We’ll never know.

Trick-or-treater on the right, I dub thee Zombie Mamie Van Doren.