Tag Archives: movies

Vincent Price documentary on TCM captures the day he came to my hometown, Muncie

Yesterday, I was watching the new documentary “Vincent Price: What Keeps Us Alive,” which I had DVRd from TCM’s premiere of the program Friday evening, and found it quite good. I’ve always liked Price and if you search for his name here on this site you’ll find posts about when I met him at an airport in the early 1980s and when I met his kind and generous daughter, Victoria Price, this summer here in Knoxville.

But as I was watching the documentary, I was startled to see some B-roll footage of Price talking to a large group of people and the caption read, “Vincent Price visits Ball State Teachers College 1963.”

If I’d ever known Price had visited my hometown of Muncie, Indiana, I’d forgotten that fact.

I was a pre-schooler at the time of his visit and was a few years away from becoming the huge fan of horror movies that I would become.

For his part, Price was in another of his career high points. He’d been acting on stage and screen since the 1930s and co-starred in “Laura” in 1944. He’d become, along with Boris Karloff, the king of American horror films in the mid-century, starring in a string of classic films like “The Tingler” and “House on Haunted Hill” in 1959.

His film roles in the 1960s brought him another kind of fame as he played the lead in a string of Edgar Allan Poe adaptations for director/producer Roger Corman and American International Pictures. Right before his Muncie visit the latest of those films, “The Raven” had been released and more films now regarded as classics were to come.

Price was in the midst of something else in 1963. He was promoting the democratization of art as part of a promotion by huge retailer Sears to encourage people to buy prints of works of art by great artists. As part of that promotion, Price appeared in hundreds of cities and towns, showcasing the art prints available at Sears and giving talks at local colleges and universities.

Among those was Ball State Teachers College in Muncie, where the footage used in the documentary was captured. The school was renamed Ball State University in 1965.

I was curious how the local newspapers covered Price’s appearance. It wasn’t that long before the aging newspaper editors, out of touch with popular culture, would question the need to put the 1980 assassination of John Lennon, for example, on page one.

But Price had the right mixture of old Hollywood and art appreciation to convince the editors to cover his March 6, 1963 appearance.

Both the Muncie Star and the Muncie Evening Press ran announcements of his appearance in advance and covered him at receptions with the city’s leading industrialists and philanthropists like various Ball and Kitselman family members.

I’m most proud of coverage by Roy Bigger of the Muncie Evening Press, who wrote a page one story for March 7 about Price’s talk to an “overflow audience” at a Ball State convocation in which he talked about art and the public’s right to know, understand, appreciate and own art. That’s where Sears’ art collection offerings came in, of course. He talked about writers like Tennessee Williams and artists like James Whistler.

About 500 people had to be turned away from the convocation in Ball State’s Assembly Hall, Bigger reported.

So cool to discover, even 60 years after the fact, the meeting of my hometown and one of my favorite film actors.

You’ve somehow stumbled upon the latest of more than 1,100 posts on keithroysdon dot com, stretching back to the early 2010s. Books, writing, movies, TV, obscure pop culture, Halloween, snark and more snark. I’m the author of crime novels THAT OCTOBER and SEVEN ANGELS, co-author of four true crime books including the award-winning THE WESTSIDE PARK MURDERS and hundreds of short stories, news articles and pop culture pieces in spots like CrimeReads, Daily Yonder and elsewhere. You can contact me by leaving a message anywhere on this site or by hollering at me on one of my too many social media outposts.

Happy Halloween! To celebrate, watch a scary movie and the new SCTV documentary

Around these parts, we love Halloween. It’s long been my favorite holiday, since I was a kid and – because we couldn’t afford to buy one of those awful plastic tunics – I made my own costume by painting a beard on my face with watercolor paint and completing my outfit with an old shirt or hoodie.

If you look to your right on this screen under the heading “what the what,” you’ll find a link to a lot of Halloween posts on this site, going back most of the way to the origin of this site in the early 2010s. You’ll find posts about vintage and recent Halloween costumes and decor as well as Halloween movies to watch.

I have to note, however, a subject that makes me feel equally childlike: SCTV, also known as Second City Television.

With the loss of Catherine O’Hara and Joe Flaherty, two SCTV mainstays, and the aging status of most of the rest of the cast, who appeared on stage for years before landing Second City and SCTV television shows beginning in 1976, I’m really glad we’re in the golden age of documentaries about “SCTV” and its stars. There are good reminiscences of John Candy available and the documentary of the still-very-much-with-us Martin Short’s life, “Marty: Life is Short,” debuted just a few months ago, although I guarantee you’ll get teary before the end credits roll.

Still to come to home video this fall is “You Had to Be There,” the 2025 documentary about the 1972 stage production of “Godspell” starring Victor Garber and many of the geniuses of SCTV.

The Martin Short and “Godspell” docs could serve as bookends for “SCTV: The Greatest Show You’ve Never Heard Of,” which debuted on Netflix last night, I believe. (That’s when I saw it, anyway, and I watched it the minute I could.)

With interviews with O’Hara and Short and Dave Thomas and Eugene Levy and many others, including SCTV fans like Conan O’Brien, the SCTV doc looks back fondly on the show and the cast but doesn’t avoid touching on controversies like the divide among cast members when Dave Thomas and Rick Moranis “took off” – pun intended – with their McKenzie Brothers characters from the Great White North and won not only a comedy album but a movie, “Strange Brew,” released in 1983 and starring Thomas and Moranis and Max von Sydow, if you can believe it.

The SCTV doc made me holler with delight several times as it presented clips from not only Count Floyd’s “Monster Chiller Horror Theater” – featuring Flaherty as the horror film host who also doubles as the station’s news anchor, Candy as horror movie mad scientist Doctor Tongue and Eugene Levy as Woody Tobias Jr., also known as the hunchback henchman – but lesser-remembered bits like “Play It Again, Bob,” with Woody Allen (Moranis) making a movie about Bob Hope (Thomas). The impersonations are the best I’ve ever seen.

The six seasons of “SCTV,” including the NBC late-night seasons, are available on streaming services and online and if you’re an SCTV fan you’ll enjoy a lot of it. The show could get lost in itself at times, but that was the fun of it: the conceit of SCTV being the programming of a basic cable channel called SCTV, the cast and writers could parody every type of TV show, movie and commercial. They built a show around these parodies but made us believe that this was the worst TV station in the world, run by lunatics and egomaniacs.

Definitely enjoy a good fun scary movie this Halloween – or anytime – but you should seek out “SCTV” episodes and the documentaries I cite here.

You’ve somehow stumbled upon the latest of more than 1,100 posts on keithroysdon dot com, stretching back to the early 2010s. Books, writing, movies, TV, obscure pop culture, Halloween, snark and more snark. I’m the author of crime novels THAT OCTOBER and SEVEN ANGELS, co-author of four true crime books including the award-winning THE WESTSIDE PARK MURDERS and hundreds of short stories, news articles and pop culture pieces in spots like CrimeReads, Daily Yonder and elsewhere. You can contact me by leaving a message anywhere on this site or by hollering at me on one of my too many social media outposts.

Universal Monsters Channel and other FAST channels lurk in your cable TV hinterlands, and they’re weird

They’re out there. They’re lurking in your TV lineup.

And they’re weird.

I’m talking not just about the Universal Monsters Channel, but other odd and occasionally cool channels in the 1,000-something range on your cable television lineup. Maybe 10,000-something.

Somewhere up there in the channel range you can’t easily just stumble across, and also on services like Roku, apparently, are channel offerings like the Universal Monsters Channel, which true to its name offers 24/7 showings of classic Universal horror films of the 1930s-1950s like “Bride of Frankenstein” and the Creature from the Black Lagoon trilogy as well as newer films from Universal.

But it’s not just Universal monsters that are hiding in there, waiting to be stumbled upon. There’s a channel that offers nothing but Universal mainstream movies, channels that are devoted to TV series like “Xena,” “Andromeda,” “The Virginian,” “Las Vegas” … there’s a lot and a lot of it is pretty obscure.

The oddest thing about these channels is how they’re set up. You can’t click a channel on at, say, 10 p.m. to watch “Frankenstein” or your favorite episode of “Xena.”

And you can’t set your DVR to record any of the movies or shows.

The FAST – which stands for Free Ad-Supported Streaming Television – channels don’t care about your schedule or your pathetic “time-shifting” goals. If you want to see “Revenge of the Creature” and it’s on at 2 in the morning, by god, you set your alarm and get up and watch it through bleary eyes.

The movies and shows are advertising supported but at least on my cable lineup they don’t seem to have many ads. So you might see a 30-second spot for a coffeemaker, for example, followed by 90 seconds of this:

Yes, a countdown until the movie or show resumes.

These channels are odd. They’re more like old-timey television, in the days before you could record and time-shift to watch a show later. Although you can’t count on anything starting on the hour or half hour, because the programming doesn’t have breaks full of commercials or previews. One movie ends and the next begins.

In other words, don’t count on starting your binge of any of these shows from the beginning on a FAST channel.

Variety reported a while back that nearly 2,000 of these FAST channels are available.

In March 2025, Deadline reported that Universal had launched 40 FAST channels dedicated to the SNL vault, “Little House on the Prairie,” “Murder She Wrote” and other programs. And yes, a lot of the programming is available elsewhere on streaming.

But only with FAST channels could you turn on your TV on a random Tuesday and still be seeing Frankenstein’s monster or Nellie Oleson a week later. (Yes, I had to look up the spelling.)

It’s all out there. In a chaotic but totally locked-in manner. And it’s probably hidden in the far reaches of your cable dial.

TCM’s Halloween month: It’s the most wonderful time of the year! (Plus a new Vincent Price documentary!)

Hopefully you recognize the wonderful Victoria Price, daughter of classic actor Vincent Price, in that shot with me, taken at this summer’s CreepyCon here in Knoxville.

CreepyCon was a lot of fun, but meeting Ms. Price and getting a chance to tell her about the time I met her father was a highlight of the day. That story in a moment.

I’m making special note of the one-and-only Vincent Price in part because a new documentary about him, “Vincent Price: What Keeps Us Alive,” debuts on TCM (Turner Classic Movies) on October 30. In addition to Ms. Price, the doc features interviews with people who knew, worked with and admired Vincent Price like Tim Burton, John Waters, Bill Hader, Alice Cooper, Patton Oswalt and Cassandra Peterson, also known as Elvira, Mistress of the Dark.

The documentary puts a button on TCM’s buildup to what’s one of my top two holidays.

I grew up watching Price’s films and other classic horror and terror movies when I could catch them at drive-in theaters or on late-night TV, years before the era of home video and cable TV. We cherished, as film fans and monster fanatics, the opportunity to see them. It’s a lot easier now thanks to the plethora of horror films online and on streaming.

For a couple of decades, TCM and other movie channels like AMC bridged the gap for us, never more so than in October, when TV and cable programmed a delightful number of horror films, including the work of Price.

When I got to speak with Ms. Price at CreepyCon I got to tell her my favorite of her father’s films which in some ways bracketed the most active years of his career, “House on Haunted Hill” from 1958 – before I was born – and “The Abominable Dr. Phibes” in 1971, when I was still a kid. (Vincent Price died in 1993.)

This year, TCM is doing a lot of Halloween programming and much of it is the kind of material that helps TCM distinguish itself from other channels and streaming services. (Link at the end of this post to a TCM page that went up just today with program highlights.)

A centerpiece of TCM’s October programming is always “Creepy Cinema,” in which TCM host Ben Mankiewicz and guest host Mario Cantone spotlight some fun and often campy films, which this year put the emphasis on campy with films featuring Bette Davis, Joan Crawford and Angela Lansbury. But there’s also some films genuinely perfect for the mini-film festival including “The Sentinel” (1977), which my friends and I had a ball with, vintage Hammer horrors and “The Thing From Another World” from 1951, one of my very favorite films and the forerunner of John Carpenter’s classic “The Thing” from 1982.

The last two days of the month, TCM has scheduled, besides the Price documentary, 27 films including the 1979 Frank Langella “Dracula,” 1974’s offbeat “Phantom of the Paradise” and others.

TCM’s programmers seem intent on giving us an experience we can’t get anywhere else. Most of these films we might be able to find elsewhere, but probably not all and we wouldn’t have the great intros and outros of the TCM hosts.

Before the link to the TCM roundup, my Vincent Price story:

In 1982, I was about four years into my gig reviewing movies for the evening paper where I worked. I’d begun in 1978, while I was starting college, and I reviewed films until 1990. By 1990, I had begun covering government, politics and crime and where the three intersected.

But while I was still reviewing movies, I did interviews with directors like John Carpenter and George Romero and went to press junkets, including the 1982 junket for “Conan the Barbarian,” the first film featuring Arnold Schwarzenegger as the Robert E. Howard adventurer.

After a couple of days of interviews in Chicago, I was at O’Hare Airport waiting to fly back home when I spotted, near my gate, Vincent Price sitting by himself across the way.

No one else was around – we were both early for our respective flights – and I walked over to him. He invited me to sit down and I explained, probably in starstruck manner, how much I loved his films and performances.

Although he undoubtedly got recognized all the time – and would soon reach another, modern level of fame with the “rap” on Michael Jackson’s “Thriller” hit – he was kind and gracious. He invited me to sit down and we talked for a half-hour about movies, TV, Chicago and travel. He was so nice and kind.

At CreepyCon a few weeks ago, I told Victoria Price how much I appreciated her father’s reaction and encouragement of this barely-past-college-age fan.

She thanked me and said she would mention my anecdote when she spoke to a crowd later.

I won’t be missing the TCM documentary about Vincent Price, a kind and gracious man. Here’s that TCM link:

https://www.tcm.com/articles/now-playing-newsletter/60298/tcm-does-halloween

Regal theater chain showing 31 nights of horror films for Halloween

I’m not sure what’s better – watching a good horror movie in the (darkened) comfort of your home or watching in a theater.

(You notice I’m not including the stone-age choice here of watching a horror movie in a drive-in theater, although I watched plenty that way growing up and as a young adult. Bless the drive-in theaters that operate today, but going to a drive-in these days is more of a fun “going to a drive-in” exercise, not a “going to see a movie” exercise.)

I’ve certainly seen many more horror films at home in the past decade or two, more than I’ve seen in theaters. But back in the day, including the period from 1978 to 1990 when I was reviewing movies for my hometown newspaper, I saw a lot of horror movies in the theater. I mean: “Halloween.”

That’s why I believe seeing any movie in a theater, especially a horror movie, is such a great experience. I definitely saw horror movies in theaters before I saw “The Exorcist” in 1973. (I’m still not quite sure how I saw the film, one of the greatest films and one of the greatest horror films ever, in the theater. I was years too young to have bought a ticket for an R-rated film. And yet …)

Anyway, I think I’ll always prefer seeing a good horror film in a theater. The big screen. The great sound. The cathartic feeling of an audience sharing a scare. And yes, even the shouted warnings from excited members of the audience. (“Watch out! He’s behind you!”)

And while I can’t say I’ll definitely see one of the horror films that the Regal theater chain plans to show in October, it’s very tempting to try to work that into my schedule.

Across the country, Regal is offering its “31 Screams on Screens” promotion, screening horror films from decades of scary movies for the low price of $7.99 a ticket.

The selection of films includes some of my favorites as well as some I haven’t seen. Here’s the list:

Oct. 1 — The Blackcoat’s Daughter (2015)
Oct. 2 — The Shining (1980)
Oct. 3 — Bram Stoker’s Dracula (1992)
Oct. 4 — The Conjuring (2013)
Oct. 5 — Poltergeist (1982)
Oct. 6 — The Haunting (1999)
Oct. 7 — Crimson Peak (2015)
Oct. 8 — Tales from the Hood (1995)
Oct. 9 — In the Mouth of Madness (1994)
Oct. 10 — Pet Sematary (1989)
Oct. 11 — Drag Me to Hell (2009)
Oct. 12 — The Thing (1982)
Oct. 13 — The Texas Chainsaw Massacre (2003)
Oct. 14 — Henry: Portrait of a Serial Killer (1986)
Oct. 15 — Psycho II (1983)
Oct. 16 — Candyman (1992) and Candyman (2021)
Oct. 17 — Scream 2 (1997)
Oct. 18 — A Nightmare on Elm Street (1984) and A Nightmare on Elm Street 3: Dream Warriors (1987)
Oct. 19 — The Blob (1988)
Oct. 20 — Evil Dead (2013)
Oct. 21 — Dawn of the Dead (2004)
Oct. 22 — Cabin Fever director’s cut (2002)
Oct. 23 — Midsommar director’s cut (2019)
Oct. 24 — Us (2019)
Oct. 25 — The Blair Witch Project (1999)
Oct. 26 — Constantine (2005)
Oct. 27 — The Cabin in the Woods (2011)
Oct. 28 — It Follows (2014)
Oct. 29 — Christine (1983)
Oct. 30 — Halloween (1978)
Oct. 31 — Trick ‘r Treat (2007)

There’s something for almost everyone there.

Here’s the link to the Regal site:

https://www.regmovies.com/horror-movies

‘Star Trek,’ ‘Doctor Who,’ ‘Star Wars’ – the future’s not what it once was

This is ancient history – actually, that would be a good name for this site – but there was a time in the 1970s when “Star Trek” looked deader than one of Dr. Leonard McCoy’s patients. The original series had ended nearly a decade before, the show’s creative minds were waffling between making a new TV series and a big-screen movie – I don’t have to tell you how the success of “Star Wars” in 1977 made up their minds to produce a theatrical film – and it was not at all certain the franchise – which isn’t a word that was commonly applied to creative properties back then – would continue.

So Paramount’s decision to hire director Robert Wise to make “Star Trek: The Motion Picture” was a pivotal moment in the … well, franchise.

I can’t describe to you today what it was like to be watching a syndicated rerun of the original “Star Trek” series one Sunday morning on an Indianapolis TV station in 1979 and see a commercial for “The Motion Picture.” My friends and I in our local “Star Trek” club had been keeping up on the making of the film, of course, so it wasn’t a surprise. But it damn sure was a thrill. (Say what you will about the first movie, but we anticipated it like crazy.)

Fast forward to spring 2026 – it is spring, isn’t it? – and “Star Trek: Starfleet Academy” has been canceled after its first season on the Paramount Plus streaming service. A second season has already been filmed and will air, I guess, on the streamer, as well the fourth and fifth seasons of “Star Trek: Strange New Worlds,” which have already been made and which has already been canceled.

I’m not inclined to support Paramount because of its repugnant politics, but I gotta say I’ve stuck around with the service in part because of the chance to see new “Trek” episodes. These cancelations aren’t giving me many reasons to stick around longer.

I know plenty of people who are so sick of working in restaurants and stores and even patronizing restaurants and stores and hearing music from a half-century ago playing on the Muzak. When will Boomers die and take their music and their franchises with them? I’m at the tail-end of the Boomer generation and I wonder that sometimes too.

But we’ve reached a point here in which we might see an end to, or at least a hiatus of, some long-running franchises.

“Doctor Who” is at a crossroads with the latest season of the show, which began in the 1960s, ending (except for a purported Christmas special still to come this year) and Disney opting out of future involvement.

The “Star Wars” franchise – HOW MANY TIMES WILL HE USE THAT WORD? – had substantial success with the recent “Andor” series and some uncertain promise with the “Mandolorian” movie – or has interest in that story and the lil Yoda kin dude already faded? When will we get “Star Wars” stories that aren’t immediately adjacent to the Skywalker family saga? And will we accept them if and when we do?

I suppose it’s logical enough to ask how much longer Marvel movies and TV series will continue to be made, but while the Marvel Comics world has been around for more than 60 years the MCU hasn’t been around for 20 yet. And a big hit movie will clinch the MCU as an ongoing thing.

As a matter of fact, a big hit lifts all boats. And studios are loathe to give up on any intellectual property, which is why we’re going to see more “Lord of the Rings” and “Harry Potter” shows and movies. We’ll someday see more Indiana Jones, I’m sure, and we’re already seeing more Godzilla. And I did a whole piece for CrimeReads about the Universal Studios monsters and their undead – undying – popularity.

As for “Star Trek,” it’s a shame that things – a new series? a new movie? – are so up in the air this year, the 60th year of the intellectual property.

But I’m sure the franchise will be back with some hit and life beyond the grave at some point.

And we can go on saying “franchise” and “intellectual property.”

2025 entertainment to remember

Who doesn’t love a good year-in-review? Well, plenty of people. But here’s one anyway.

2025 was a shitshow for a lot of people, and I hope 2026 is an improvement. For me, 2025 was the year I self-published my 1984-set high school crime novel THAT OCTOBER, saw a bunch of short fiction and pop culture pieces published and joined with some friends in Constellate Creatives, where we’ll offer help to writers in the form of editing, publishing and marketing.

But like Milhouse from “The Simpsons,” you might be asking, “When are they going to get to the fireworks factory?” Or in this case, when is he gonna talk about something fun, like pop culture? Movies, TV shows, books.

I won’t try to tackle books here and I’ll note that some of my favorite books I read in 2025 haven’t been published yet. So that’ll wait.

In the meantime:

MOVIES: I don’t see a ton of movies in theaters. I catch a lot of movies on streaming services. So far this year, probably my favorite and best movie I saw, first in theaters and then on streaming, was SINNERS, Ryan Coogler’s story of race and vampires in Depression-era Mississippi. Just an absorbing, exemplary film and one that proves Hollywood can reach moviegoers/viewers with something daring and origiinal.

I think SUPERMAN should carry that definition too. Yes, we’ve seen sooo many takes on the classic superhero by now. But James Gunn’s SUPERMAN gave us one of the best, most original and fully-fleshed-out comic book worlds ever.

On the Marvel side, I really enjoyed CAPTAIN AMERICA: BRAVE NEW WORLD, THUNDERBOLTS* and FANTASTIC FOUR. The latter seemed really safe and un-ambitious but was the best-by-far adaptation of my favorite comic book heroes ever.

Among streaming series, I think PLURIBUS was the best I saw, maybe tied with THE PITT. The two series couldn’t be more different, but PLURIBUS was thoughtful and funny and THE PITT was like a shot of adrenalin.

IT: WELCOME TO DERRY was also outstanding, I thought, with some of the best scares and characters and most authentic Stephen King atmosphere of any screen translation and expansion in years.

PARADISE was a good end-of-the-world contrast to PLURIBUS. BALLARD was a very good continuation of BOSCH. LONG BRIGHT RIVER was also quite good, moody and solemn and endearing. MURDERBOT was brutally funny. TASK was somber and intense. THE HUNTING WIVES was looney fun. THE BETTER SISTER was grim and affecting.

I wanted more of most of these series but admit I felt a little cheated of a proper conclusion when they ended with another season clearly in mind (or hoped for). I really want more DERRY and PLURIBUS and don’t mind feeling used and teased.

Indiana Jones and the Perpetual Remake Machine

A few weeks ago, rumors moved through online circles that Disney was planning to reboot the Indiana Jones series with a new series of films starring someone other than Harrison Ford as Dr. Henry Jones Jr.

I totally expect this will happen.

I don’t think it’s likely that Pedro Pascal, currently an industry darling and starring in “Fantastic Four: First Steps,” as well as upcoming Marvel movies, will be cast in the role of the adventurous archeology professor. For one thing, Pascal is 50 years old. Ford was 39 years old at the time of “Raiders of the Lost Ark.” I think it’s much more likely that Disney will cast someone in their 30s in a remake. They want someone who could keep a movie series alive for a decade or more.

That said, if “Indiana Jones and the Dial of Destiny” had been a hit in 2023, we’d be seeing now-83-year-old Ford in continuing adventures.

But Hollywood and Disney have – sometimes more successfully than other times – long ago decided it was okay to recast and remake and reboot.

There’s been attempts to reboot the series before, or at least introduce younger versions of Jones and younger characters who could step into the role. But it didn’t work with Shia LaBeouf as Indy’s long-estranged son in 2008’s “Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull” – remember how the character started to place Indy’s hat on his head before the original reclaimed it? And it didn’t work with Phoebe Waller-Bridge as Helena Shaw in “Dial of Destiny.”

We’ve seen how some film series made recasting and rebooting work. Some handled it better than others, such as in the James Bond films. The “Star Trek” films did well with it too, at least at first. Disney and Lucasfilm tried it with the “Star Wars” films in a series of movies that worked fairly well but were harshly received by fanboys.

I’m only certain that Disney will reboot Indiana Jones at some point and will recast Indy.

Unless the practice of punching Nazis falls into disfavor.

SPOILERS for THUNDERBOLTS and you know what …

Hype is a thing. And hype might be THE thing in the movie business.

Beware – some spoilers ahead.

I won’t tell you that if you didn’t see THUNDERBOLTS* during its opening weekend that social media is determined to spoil it for you, but Marvel and many other social media accounts are hyping the holy hell out of one of the final big twists for the film.

SPOILERS HERE:

In the final scene of THUNDERBOLTS*, the reveal of what that asterisk was all about comes as they’re announced as the New Avengers. This puts them into conflict with the Avengers team that Sam Wilson, the new Captain America, is going to put together at then-president Thunderbolt Ross’ request. There’s even a reference to Sam threatening to sue the scrappy team of anti-heroes who never really accepted the name Thunderbolts.

If you know some Marvel history, you know that in the late 1990s, the comic book company decided to spin off the Avengers and the Fantastic Four into their own universe.

To fill the void – no pun intended, if you’ve seen THUNDERBOLTS* – in the Marvel comic book universe we know, where Spider-Man and the X-Men were still operating, a new Avengers team was put together in a comic book titled “Thunderbolts.”

The secret, revealed at the end of that first comic, was that the new Avengers were not heroes at all, but were actually the supervillain team the Masters of Evil.

They were villains who pretended to be heroes, although eventually many of them warmed to the idea of doing actual heroic deeds and grew into heroic roles.

The movie THUNDERBOLTS* put a nice spin on this, with shady anti-heroes coming together to save the world. And at the end, in a manipulative political move, they are dubbed the New Avengers.

The funnier or, alternately, more frustrating element of all this as related to the movie THUNDERBOLTS* is that beginning Monday morning (this morning as I write), Marvel has saturated social media sites with the film’s supposed “new title” THE NEW AVENGERS and posted video of the cast revealing the name and even Winter Soldier actor Sebastian Stan “covering” a THUNDERBOLTS* bus stop poster with one featuring the new title.

It’s a great publicity stunt that pays off months of speculation about what the asterisk at the end of the THUNDERBOLTS* title meant.

It you didn’t get caught and spoiled, you might agree.*

*Or not.

‘House of 1,000 Dolls’ is vintage sleaze starring Vincent Price

By the standards of the exploitation movies of just a few years later, there’s not that much shocking about “House of 1,000 Dolls,” a 1967 German-Spanish co-production starring Vincent Price as a magician who hypnotizes women during his nightclub act in Tangiers. The women end up in a house of prostitution, although there are considerably fewer than 1,000 women there. Unless maybe you count the miniature actual dolls that line one bookshelf?

“House of 1,000 Dolls” definitely qualifies as racy stuff for the period and it no doubt titillated drive-in movie audiences with its scenes of kidnapped women wearing bras and panties and filmy gowns.

And Price apparently was a little scandalized. This was during the period the actor was starring in well-remembered, full-color Roger Corman adaptations of Edgar Allen Poe tales and, according to one interview, Price was startled to learn that the makers of “House of 1,000 Dolls” were shooting more explicit scenes on the sets when his scenes were not filmed.

My favorite aspect of the movie, though, is the presence in the cast of an actor named Herbert Fux. He was an Austrian actor who, in addition to appearing in legit and semi-legit films, also appeared in some kind of porn films. And he was in politics as well.

As the old Smuckers commercials might have said, “With a name like Fux, it has to be porn.”

“House of 1,000 Dolls” is available via streaming and it’s worth it alone to see Price running around in a top hat and cape.